Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Related for Bava Metzia 105:4

לא סלקא דעתך דתניא בהדיא מעשר שני בטיל ברובא ובאיזה מעשר שני אמרו במעשר שאין בו שוה פרוטה ושנכנס לירושלים ויצא ואם איתא לדחזקיה ליעבד ליה לדחזקיה וניחל ליה על מעות הראשונות דלא פריק

— You cannot say thus, because in respect of <i>terumah</i> only the stringencies of <i>terumah</i> are taught, not its leniencies.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' v. p. 313, n. 8. An examination of the various points shews that the object of the Tanna is to teach wherein terumah is more stringent than the tithe, not wherein it is lighter. ');"><sup>10</sup></span> But he teaches '[they] are accounted the priest's property!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which is a leniency compared with the second tithe, ');"><sup>11</sup></span> — You cannot think so,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That the second tithe cannot be neutralised at all, ');"><sup>12</sup></span>

Tosefta Bikkurim

And so too Rabbi Shimon would say, [the Sages] did not state that produce that grows from [the seeds of] first fruits must be eaten in Jerusalem. "Tithes" -- about which "tithes" did they speak [when the Sages ruled that aftergrowths must be treated as tithes (see Ter. 9:6)]? [They ruled that aftergrowths are treated as tithes only] with regards to anything whose seed disintegrates [after planting], with regards to [produce] that is taken in and out of Jerusalem, with regards to [produce] that does not have the value of a perutah, and with regards to [produce] that is not [subject to the laws of] redemption. Rabbi Shimon ben Yehuda says in the name of Rabbi Shimon, one is not liable [to bring] first fruits that are attached to the ground.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse